Archive for April, 2007

Apr 29 2007

Sunburst for Kentucky

Published by Vergil under running

Running onto the inner track of Church Hill Downs (Kentucky Derby fame) the thought hit me: whereas Notre Dame fans like the idea of running onto the field at the Sunburst races, Kentuckians like the idea of running on the track of Church Hill Downs.

But that didn’t help me much: Mile 14 I crashed. I would complain about the hills, so I will…I wasn’t prepared for them. The course was beautiful, but in no way should I have been trying for a PR. Wonderful people and wonderfully organized.

So, here are my numbers (and they had a really cool thing where people could follow your progress through the course. I signed up for the results to be sent to my email address, so I’m posting the last one that summarizes my race (and you’ll see a drop off from about the half-way point: 20ishK…I was on pace for a 3:40 finish until then):

Chris Judson has finished the Derby Festival Marathon in 4:02:56 at an average pace of 9:16.1.

According to preliminary results, he is number 343 overall and number 43 in his age group. These results are subject to change when results are finalized.

Splits:

10K: 0:51:27
15K: 1:17:43
25K: 2:13:06
30K: 2:43:09
Finish (42.2K) - Gun Time: 4:04:52
Finish (42.2K) - Net Time: 4:02:56

Thanks Louisville, KY for a wonderful experience and good seafood at Joe’s Crab Shack on the River!

No responses yet

Apr 27 2007

Off to Louisville!

Published by Vergil under running

We leaving very soon for the Kentucky Derby Marathon. Looking for a pr of 3:40 and the weather looks great.
Now, for a 5hourish drive with Lois.

No responses yet

Apr 24 2007

License to Plate: Play by the rules?

Published by Vergil under Belief, Culture, education

InGodWeTrustI’ve not been a fan of the newer “In God We Trust” Indiana license plates for a few reasons, but the one that bothers me the most is that Indiana drivers don’t have to pay extra for the special plate.

That should bother any tax payer, yes?

I can see how some of my Christian friends would want to get one of these faith-based plates, or as The Christian Post puts it:

Indiana’s newest faith-friendly license plates are doing well in purchases, allowing thousands of state drivers to express their relationship with God.

So a lawsuit was filed yesterday (and it made its way through the AP wire via Indy Star) that the ACLU finds the license plates “unconstitutional.”

And, I have to agree with them on this one.

The man who filed the suit has a point:

“I’m into the environment. I wanted to make a statement,” Studler said. “And for them to just come out and put out a free plate that’s a special plate” seems unfair.

I have difficulty, though, with the logic of the religious view (offered up by Curt Smith, president of the Indiana Family Institute)

“We mention God in the Declaration of Independence and in many of our founding documents, and so I think it’s very appropriate and legitimate to encourage the dissemination of this phrase.”

But that’s not what the original intent of the plate was:

Rep. Woody Burton, R-Greenwood, led the effort in 2006 that created the plate. He has said that judges are chipping away at the Judeo-Christian foundation of America, and he backed the plate to give like-minded residents the chance to show their concern.

I think I know where this is headed (even though there are now over a “half-million” of the plates sold in a 5-month period). I expect a lot from the folks on the right in this “conversation” but I have a feeling that they will cry “foul” or play the “historical” argument as Smith does. What is more unfortunate is that my conservative Christian friends won’t play fair because they feel that their beliefs trumps all things. God, believers, the country–are not being persecuted on this issue. This issue is about not giving special privileges to people because of their beliefs (be it God or the environment or Riley’s Hospital or Indiana University or Grace College or the World Champion Colts).

And I know it’s cliche, but I think the spirit of the phrase is true: “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”

Go pay the $20 fee and play nice with others.

Now, let’s work on the mandatory pledge and moment of silence in Indiana schools.

One response so far

Apr 16 2007

Two weeks until Louisville; Personally.

Published by Vergil under running

The long run Saturday (12-miler) went well and fairly bearable (+39f).

Today, Lois and I did some online quizzes and here are the results to two of mine:

What American accent do you have?

Your Result: The Midland

 

“You have a Midland accent” is just another way of saying “you don’t have an accent.” You probably are from the Midland (Pennsylvania, southern Ohio, southern Indiana, southern Illinois, and Missouri) but then for all we know you could be from Florida or Charleston or one of those big southern cities like Atlanta or Dallas. You have a good voice for TV and radio.

The West

 

The South

 

Boston

 

North Central

 

The Inland North

 

Philadelphia

 

The Northeast

 

What American accent do you have?
Quiz Created on GoToQuiz
which scrubs character r u

Your Result: J.D

 

you’re a daydreamer, often drifting off and fantasizing (…perhaps when u should be paying attention?)You’re very social and get along with people. You can also be a bit strange at times…

Dr. Cox

 

Elliot

 

Carla

 

Ted

 

The Janitor

 

The Todd

 

Dr. Kelso

 

which scrubs character r u
Create a Quiz

One response so far

Apr 08 2007

20-Miler fun

Published by Vergil under running




20-Miler fun

Originally uploaded by vergil66.

Perhaps it’s just me, but in any marathon training schedule, it’s that run roughly 4 weeks before the race: it’s the LONG RUN. This was a good run despite the +22f weather with a bit of 16 mph “in-the-face” wind that pelted my face for 1/2 mile on CR 32. Besides that, the iPod listening was good (”Wait, wait….Don’t Tell Me”; “Grammar Girl”; MacBreak Weekly; NPR Sunday Puzzler and more of _Freakanomics_).
Now, in relief, it’s tapper from here on out until the last week of April when we’re running in Louisville.

No responses yet

Apr 07 2007

Website from the past (circa 1998)

Published by Vergil under Boys

With the birth of my first son, Evan, I decided to use my new found skills as a Claris Homepage fiddler to put together a website…for real. I found these main page images that served as a clickable image for that site:

EW again
EW site

No responses yet

Apr 06 2007

But, an iPod will teach them good

Published by Vergil under Apple, Culture, education

From Engaget:

Facing a $1 billion budget deficit, Michigan state House Democrats have proposed the natural addition to such a weighted spending plan: free iPods for every kid. Ostensibly for educational purposes, the $38 million plan would provide iPods or MP3 players to every student in Michigan to use as a learning tool. We’ve seen laptops — which Michigan (and Virginia) handed out to its students a few year back — and even PSPs be put to such educational use

One response so far

Apr 06 2007

"Indiana Plan for Digital-Age Learning” fails on logic and pedagogy

Published by Vergil under Indiana, Politics, education

As sometimes I do when I have extra time on a Spring Break where it is snowing outside, I cruise on over to the Indiana DOE site to see what is “coming down the pipe” from Indianapolis. I know that 7 Habits encourages us to not concentrate on the Circle of Concern that is not within our Circle of Influence, but I still think what I say about an educational matter still has merit.

So today found me looking at the “Indiana Plan for Digital-Age Learning” (Jan 2007) publication and apparently final report. I know that I read it looking for the key words that gets me a bit keyed up (heck, I’ve begun a separate blog just for technology and education), but here are some things that will still be there when I go back and do a closer read (and my apologies to twitter readers for my ranting):

The makeup of the committee that brings the recommendation are truly shareholders in education: they are mostly business owners or administrators in the technology field. The only “educators” are either school IT people or school administrators. The only active teacher is Jan Weir, a high school chemistry teacher. My bet, and I pick this up from the report, that most of the data to support their recommendations came from other sources rather than real knowledge within the classroom.

The “proof” data itself is based upon projections and even if you didn’t like it, the book Freakanomics should be a lesson for us that those who try and forecast trends and especially educational ones are merely just giving a guess and not prophecy. You know this because there is little “here’s the other side of the story” discussion. About the only concession you’ll get on reports such as these are the obligatory “technology alone is not the magic bullet” and “technology is a tool” comments. But the rest of the report will sing the glories of the report’s conclusions.

Speaking of “proof” you always need an “edge” in scaring those who might disagree with your recommendations, and in Indiana it is “the brain drain.” All of our brightest kids are leaving the states to go elsewhere. Don’t you think that it might have something to do with the weather in Indiana (hey, it’s snowing today…and it’s Spring Break!) Bring in the woes of the economy and then use it as proof that you as taxpayers need to spend more money on computers. This is a logical fallacies because nowhere in the report does it give proof that if we spend more time and money on computers and this approach to how we do school will our kids be “more competitive” in the workplace (and btw, what about actually learning?)

My favorite part is the survey of teachers, because they come across as, well, a bit technologically dumb in the results (represented by handy Excel-generated bar graphs). And this is my favorite because it’s the most true: teachers are cautious because each 7 years, someone says that that “THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO DO SCHOOL” and teachers are human and pretty smart and will know that if it is as promised, there will be proof. For technology in the classroom (all the new whiteboards and snazzy software to make Johnny finally appear to be reading because of the report at the end of the session) the proof is not there.

So, all of this on a quick read. I fully admit my lack of close read and will do that later. My gut feeling is that my instincts are right: people love the new stuff and want a magic bullet, but rarely want to talk in depth about the relationship to pedagogy. Education as a whole has been the whipping boy of public discourse and politics for too long (you realize that the “Nation at Risk” document in 1983 is responsible for most of this and, surprise, may based on faulty data and conclusion).

Sure, we do things differently now than we did when I was in high school (1984); so, as we try and infuse some of these ways of communication into our classrooms, ask a teacher first…and pull up a chair and take note, because it’ll take awhile to see how solid pedagogy directs technology’s usage.

5 responses so far

Apr 03 2007

Enjoying the “Gettysburg Address”

Published by Vergil under Culture, Productivity, Writing, education

Inspired by the PowerPoint wizard’s treatment of “The Gettysburg Address,” I decided to play with a pair of Unix analysis programs– style and diction– and see what would happen to Lincoln’s famous speech.

Here’s the original speech:

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

And now the analysis (style first, then diction):

readability grades:
Kincaid: 10.2
ARI: 12.1
Coleman-Liau: 9.1
Flesch Index: 70.4
Fog Index: 13.4
Lix: 40.8 = school year 6
SMOG-Grading: 10.1
sentence info:
1149 characters
272 words, average length 4.22 characters = 1.29 syllables
10 sentences, average length 27.2 words
50% (5) short sentences (at most 22 words)
10% (1) long sentences (at least 37 words)
3 paragraphs, average length 3.3 sentences
0% (0) questions
60% (6) passive sentences
longest sent 82 wds at sent 10; shortest sent 11 wds at sent 3
word usage:
verb types:
to be (8) auxiliary (11)
types as % of total:
conjunctions 5(13) pronouns 16(44) prepositions 9(24)
nominalizations 2(5)
sentence beginnings:
pronoun (5) interrogative pronoun (0) article (2)
subordinating conjunction (0) conjunction (1) preposition (0)

Diction

gettysburg.txt:3: Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing [whether -> (avoid using "or not" after "whether," unless you mean "regardless of whether")] that nation, or any nation [so -> (do not use as intensifier)] conceived and [so -> (do not use as intensifier)] dedicated, [can -> (do not confuse with "may")] long endure.

gettysburg.txt:3: We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that [that -> Double word.] nation [might -> (do not confuse with "may")] live.

gettysburg.txt:5: But, in a larger sense, we [can not -> (use "cannot" unless you want to put special emphasis on the word "not")] dedicate — we [can not -> (use "cannot" unless you want to put special emphasis on the word "not")] consecrate — we [can not -> (use "cannot" unless you want to put special emphasis on the word "not")] hallow — this ground.

gettysburg.txt:5: The world [will -> (shall is sometimes used with first person pronouns and the future tense. It expresses something you believe will happen, not something that you are determined to do. A drowning man shouts: "I shall drown, no one will save me!")] little note, [nor -> Restrict to following "neither", but do not use instead of "or" in negative expressions.] long remember what we say here, but it [can -> (do not confuse with "may")] never forget what [they -> (do not use as substitute for "each, each one, everybody, every one, anybody, any one, somebody, some one")] did here.

gettysburg.txt:5: It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work [which -> (use "that" if clause is restrictive)] [they -> (do not use as substitute for "each, each one, everybody, every one, anybody, any one, somebody, some one")] who fought here have thus far [so -> (do not use as intensifier)] nobly advanced.

gettysburg.txt:5: It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for [which -> (use "that" if clause is restrictive)] [they -> (do not use as substitute for "each, each one, everybody, every one, anybody, any one, somebody, some one")] gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead [shall -> (shall is sometimes used with first person pronouns and the future tense. It expresses something you believe will happen, not something that you are determined to do. A drowning man shouts: "I shall drown, no one will save me!")] not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, [shall -> (shall is sometimes used with first person pronouns and the future tense. It expresses something you believe will happen, not something that you are determined to do. A drowning man shouts: "I shall drown, no one will save me!")] have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the [people -> Do not use with numbers or as substitute for "public".], by the [people -> Do not use with numbers or as substitute for "public".], for the [people -> Do not use with numbers or as substitute for "public".], [shall -> (shall is sometimes used with first person pronouns and the future tense. It expresses something you believe will happen, not something that you are determined to do. A drowning man shouts: "I shall drown, no one will save me!")] not perish from the earth.

23 phrases in 10 sentences found.

One response so far

Apr 03 2007

Spring Break Questions

Published by Vergil under Culture, Productivity, education

Someone asked me to come up with some questions to engage a sibling in amusing conversation (yes, that is quite cryptic). Since the list took some creative energy (dated 30 Mar), I’ve copied it here for your viewing pleasure. Feel welcome in adding your own or giving your take on the questions.

*The State of Indiana (along with a few other states) are offering an “In God We Trust” license plate to its drivers with no additional fee. Drivers can choose between the regular state plate or this red, white, and blue version that has the proclamation on it. Question: Does this violate the separation of church and state idea?

*Recently a female blogger was at the end of a vicious verbal attack by other bloggers. The attacks came in the form of threats of violent behavior and eventually Kathy Sierra couldn’t take it anymore when she received the last threat. She writes in her blog:
“…, somebody crossed a line. They posted a photo of a noose next to my head, and one of their members (posting as “Joey”) commented “the only thing Kathy has to offer me is that noose in her neck size.” Here’s the link: http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2007/03/as_i_type_this_.html
Is the internet protected by the same free speech (first amendment) ideas and mainstream media? Even though these types of “threats” happen a lot, is this case different because the person who is on the receiving end happens to be a woman?

* Ginger or Maryann?

* Wilma or Betty?

* Attorney A. Gonzalez or Former Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Mike Brown?

* Rumsfeld or Ashcroft?

* Obama or Clinton?

* Al Gore or John Kerry?

* Iraq like Vietnam or Iraq like Korea?

* “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” or Anna Nicole Smith?

*If Starbucks advertises that they do purchase fair trade coffee and I drink Starbucks coffee, does that indicate my political party of choice?

*Jimmy Stewart in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” or Barack Obama in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington”?

* John McCain (2004) or John McCain (2008)?

* Zune or iPod?

* San Francisco or New York City?

* Barry Bonds or Mark McGuire?

* “24″ or “Lost”?

* Chiquita Banana or Kathy Lee Gifford?

* Former CIA officer Valerie Plame or Oliver North?

* Head butting in a World Cup Final or Fan interference in a playoff game?

* “The Muppet Movie” or “Labyrinth”?

* “Star Wars: Return of the Jedi” or “Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith”?

* Spock or Yoda?

* Dr. Cox (”Scrubs”) or House (”House”)?

* Tiananmen Square (1989) or Berlin Wall (1989)?

Lastly:

* Heads or Tails?

3 responses so far

Next »